This work is the ideal starting point for all practitioners and is unique in covering the broad range of injunctions in one volume. The author’s practical treatment provides a description of the jurisdiction of the court to grant injunctions, together with detailed guidance through practice and procedure.

• Concise Table of Cases
• Precedents & Templates
• Supreme Court Practice Directions
• State Court Practice Directions

Pre-pub discount until 31 December 2025.

Editor-in-Chief:

With a team of expert contributors

Helmed by General Editor, Cavinder Bull S.C., this publication is annotated by some of the pre-eminent practitioners in the field. It is the leading title of its kind, presenting the most comprehensive coverage of Singapore Civil Procedure in both print and electronic format. This title provides the new Rules of Court in an annotated format and supplies supporting legislation and other material of significance.

Developments Since Last Edition

Every Order reviewed and updated since 2022.

Updates on recent cases including the following:

• Group Lease Holdings Pte Ltd (in liquidation) and another v Group Lease Public Co Ltd [2025] 3 SLR 1315, clarifies the applicable tests for the grant of mandatory and Mareva injunctions.
• Wuhu Ruyi Xinbo Investment Partnership (Ltd Partnership) v European Topsoho Sàrl [2025] SGCA 32, deals with whether proportionality applies when deciding whether to enforce an unless order following an intentional breach.
• L’Oreal and another v Shopee Singapore Pte Ltd [2025] 4 SLR 145 provides guidance on adequate or sufficient disclosure in response to an order to produce information, and disclosure standards for platform operators.
• Deutsche Bank AG Singapore Branch v ARJ Holding and another [2025] SGHC 163, covers whether agreed contractual interest rates can continue post-judgment even where not expressly stipulated.
• Madison Pacific Trust Ltd and others v David Salim and another [2025] 4 SLR 1512, deals with the scope of the Court’s power to appoint a receiver under section 4(10) of the Civil Law Act 1909 (2020 Rev Ed).
• COSCO Shipping Specialized Carriers Co, Ltd v PT OKI Pulp & Paper Mills and others [2025] SGHC 87 discusses the meaning of a party having an “interest in the appeal” and when that party ought to be served.
• Zhong Renhai and others v Goh Sock Ngee and others [2025] SGHC 43 analysed dispensing with notice requirements for an ex parte injunction application where the application concerns fungible assets that could easily be dissipated through internet banking.
• Lew Huay Jiun Isabelle and another v Lee Yu Ru Michael and another [2025] SGHC 1 comments on the court’s discretion to apply the Ladd v Marshall test to appeals that do not arise from a judgment after trial or a hearing on the merits.